Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:13
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Have you ever secretly watched someone while they were doing something private?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump’s budget puts Huntsville-made spacecraft on the chopping block - AL.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
A Mesozoic myth: Dinosaurs didn’t rule the Earth like we think - Big Think
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Which sunscreen shall we use to apply on oily skin?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
RFK Jr.’s new chronic disease agency faces a roadblock: Congress - statnews.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
"People don't even like him": Musk becomes GOP pariah after "ridiculous" Trump attacks - Axios
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.